Compare coverage, not camera quantities
For a Bexley house, a front-door view, a side passage and a driveway may each need a different approach. For business premises, the entrance and delivery area may be equally distinct. Tell us what you need to see at each point and which view takes priority if the budget is limited.
A proposal with more cameras is not necessarily a better match. Discuss mounting height, distance and the detail required before comparing totals. If existing footage is disappointing, explain when and where it becomes unhelpful so the underlying issue can be assessed.
Include the finished appearance
Mention visible cable concerns, newly decorated rooms and any restrictions on external fixings. Bexley properties with a relevant heritage designation need those constraints considered before installation positions are settled. Establish any required owner or authority permissions for your address.
Think about the scene with cars parked, a gate open or outdoor lights switched on. Explain regular obstructions rather than judging the proposed view only when the area is clear. The recorder and network connection also need accessible, agreed locations.
Make ownership clear
Decide which people should view cameras and which person controls the accounts. Ask what local recording and remote viewing each depend on, including any subscription. At handover, check playback and the process for finding an event. Where recording includes shared space or extends beyond your boundary, use current ICO guidance to understand your responsibilities. Request a quotation that identifies equipment, installation work and any ongoing service costs separately.
Further information: ICO guidance for home CCTV · ICO guidance for organisations
